Sociology

Analyzing human dilemmas, it coincides with the conflict surrounding the ability of individuals to create actions in accordance to their cognitive abilities (rational) or emotional capacities. Under this process, the ability to create a sound decision making becomes a problem particularly during times that conflicting perspectives are apparent. Seeing this, one applicable solution can revolve around the ability for individuals to determine their established principles and take into consideration the value of choices made. In here, setting a balance not only revolves around ethical and moral concerns that matter but also on its capacity to align with either the rational or emotional perspective.

In terms of tasks and relationship, a potential problem can be seen if the capacity to apply particular tasks hinder or impede the development of relationship. In here, a particular choice must be made or sacrificed in order to achieve specific goals. Given this challenge, providing solutions can be rooted in the ability of individuals to understand the nature of the task. Since these two ideas are both distinct with one another, there must be a clear focus on prescribing what appropriate actions to take (The Learning Eye, 2006). Such dimensions then allow people to balance the corresponding clash between relationships and tasks and further an appropriate stance in handling these two ideas together.

Empowerment and control are also two opposing ideas that if not addressed can lead to conflict and dilemmas. Its challenge lies on the ability of imparting these two ideas together since empowerment focuses more towards expanding capabilities towards achieving a common goal while control prefers adherence to the status quo and what is proven to be effective (Library Bytes, 2006). Seeing this, fostering solutions should come from the ability to determine the fundamental aspect of any endeavor or goal. In here, it considers what are the most appropriate directions can individuals or groups do in order to preserve continuity and adaptability. Such aspect then brings about lessening the questions surrounding the impact of these two ideas.

In the aspect of getting results and building capacity, the corresponding dilemma here revolves around the two processes getting mixed up and interchanged accordingly. Since these two ideas vary in its direction and implementation, there needs to be careful analysis made on what particular area best fits the individual or group setting. To actively solve this problem, people must lay down what prospect or direction they seek to take. For individuals who choose task results, they must focus on enhancing and optimizing the work processes and the related patterns of production. On the other hand, if the goal is towards building capacity, consideration must be made towards expanding the dimensions that work is facilitated and made (e.g. education, training, organizational changes).

The problem revolving that can be seen between having a shared vision and diversity involves around treating these two ideas independently. In this process, these ideas are taken and approached differently by organizations which then cause clashes towards inputs and particularly decision making. At the same time, it also induces an environment that is oriented towards individualism and undermines the interplay among a diversified group. To equally address this challenge, organizations or institutions need to understand that these two ideas can be synchronized and correspond with one another (Wang and Rafiq, 2009). This means that aligning perspectives to both induce individual and collective inputs must be necessary to sustain further growth. To achieve this, particular expectations towards behavior and actions must be made to sustain these ideas and guide individuals towards what direction a particular organization seeks to tread.

Lastly, problems also revolve in areas surrounding the self and team interests. In here, the dilemma arises when individuals strive for their own personal gain rather than the needs of the overall group. In here, the common notions of selfishness and inability to relate with other people are often the hindrance that induces such actions among people (Todd Coaching, 2009). Applying change and solutions to these realities surround the ability of organizations to identify what is the real direction of any goal or endeavor. If it entails the use of the self in the process, then it must properly be coordinated. The same process goes for pursuing team interests. Seeing this, the dilemma and appropriate solution here involves not mainly on what people seek to pursue but rather the inability to establish sufficient ideas and process on how to achieve this. That is why the solution entails determining the dynamics involved in each action that the organization seeks to administer.