Theories of Crime and Punishment
There are three theories of just punishment. According to J. Bentham, general prevention is ought to be the chief end of punishment as its real justification. Suppose there is an offense committed which is an isolated fact, the like of which would never recur, punishment would be useless. Benthams theory was based on a hedonistic conception of man. Crime is deterred from occurring if punishment was applied swiftly. The second theory is rehabilitation. Reform implies that punishment is a means for the offender to recognize his guilt and wish to change. Societal condemnation of a crime is the formal reform in its generic sense. Punishment is but a means to change. Utilitarian theories sees the primary justification in the fact that a crime has been committed, and as such deserves the punishment of the offender.
Broken Windows theory states that petty crime and anti-social behavior will be detrred, and that major crime will, as an outcome, be prevented. This theory implies that automatic punishments for violations of stated rules are minimized or in a sense zero tolerated. Zero tolerance policies forbid persons of authority from exercising power to change punishments subjectively. They are required to impose an initial punishment regardless of liability. However, initial punishment or prejudgment must be both necessary and rational (in lieu with existing conditions).
Juvenile gangs can be seen as a reaction toward the structure and culture of the middle class in the United States. Some individuals are institutionally displaced. The families of displaced individuals suffer the consequences of poverty, crime, and anti-social behavior. Juveniles are X factors in crimes. They tend to be critical of the present structure of their present situation. Anti-social behavior is the escape from that world. It is also the perceived solution from that condition. By engaging in anti-social behavior, they are exercising power. Power gives them the initial network for takeoff even though it is pretty much useless.
King Philips War was an armed conflict between the native Americans of southern New England and the English colonists. The English colonists squeezed the native Americans and attempted to confiscate their trade goods. The Indians had no choice but to fight the colonists. Although King Philip, the chief leader of the natives, was killed, a treaty was signed at Casco Bay recognizing the rights of the natives.
0 comments:
Post a Comment