Sociology

In the past, international leaders from developed countries delegated their business work to India since it had a strong leadership (Messner, 2008).This is so because, Indians business people enjoy working in an authority ranking as it fosters cohesion. Authority ranking has since then influenced the trend of programs in these companies such as performance appraisal systems, which serves as motivators.
In India, education plays a very critical role in ranking someone. The struggle for being ranked higher by educational status criterion has helped in creating opportunity for globalization for many Indian companies (Desai, 2009).This has led to an emergence of many computers software development technologies, which play a vital role in business globalization.

The Indian workforce seeks commitment from top management in the process initiatives. The authority ranking enables employees to comply with the quality methodologies as long its leadership is motivating and it is consistence (Desai, 2009). This motivation helps in confronting the uncertainties together. This is achieved through strategic thinking, customer orientation, aggression, commitment to global thinking, commitment to excellence, working in teams, and building future leaders (Desai, 2009).

Since getting to a point of higher authority is based on being a successful performer, the authority ranking encourages a business team to update themselves constantly in matters relating to global issues and trends (Messner, 2008).Behaviors relating to high performance describe competence as this serves as a competency indicator. This calls for an effort of identifying a successful role behavior that will take you to a higher rank for the business. In an attempt of perfecting this, the Indians have actively attempted to understand and respect cultural values of host countries of the customers, trying to build an understanding, as this will create an ease while dealing with clients and business partners globally. More so, they try identifying best practices that suit the team needs for improvement through bench marking with the world practices (Locke, 2008).